|
PR Fuel: The Worlds of Corporate Strategy and PR Collide
Wine.com turns ten this year, but the celebration has been
muted thus far. Wine-lovers are whining about the company's
actions, which have caused a public relations problem and
could cost the nation's number-one online wine retailer
business.
At issue are laws in certain states that prohibit the retail
shipment of alcohol over state lines. Wine.com, for example,
cannot ship wine to 25 states, including Alabama, Kansas,
Michigan, Pennsylvania and Utah. Napa Valley vineyards are
not allowed to ship to New Jersey, which is one reason a
friend of mine has wine shipped to my New York home a few
times each year.
One way Wine.com has been able to work around state laws is
by purchasing and working with wholesalers and retailers in
certain states. The company recently entered the Connecticut
market by acquiring a local wholesaler, and it operates
warehouses in a number of states in order to serve local
populations. Some of the company's competitors, however,
simply ignore state laws and illegally ship wine and other
alcoholic beverages. They typically do this by listing the
contents of packages as non-alcoholic products. This hurts
Wine.com, which obeys the laws and expends capital in order
to enter certain markets.
Wine.com and other retailers have, for a number of years,
tried to get states to change their laws. In the meantime,
Wine.com wants its competitors to play fairly by not
breaking these laws. To help ensure that its competitors are
obeying the law, Wine.com recently embarked on what critics
are calling a "sting operation."
As first reported by Richard Cartiere's Wine Market Report
in late December
(http://www.specialtywineretailers.org/documents/wmr-winecomreport.pdf),
Wine.com representatives have been ordering from competitors
to see if they will illegally ship wine across certain state
lines. If a company violates the law, Wine.com provides the
evidence to local regulators. According to the Wine Market
Report, regulators in Washington and New York have issued
fines to those caught in Wine.com's net.
Wine.com CEO Rich Bergsund defends his company's actions.
"We've had to ask ourselves whether we are wasting our time
and energy having all these warehouses all over the country
or not while others apparently do not," Bergsund told Wine
Market Report.
Trade organization Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of America
(WSWA) is also backing Wine.com.
"We have been saying for some time now that the enforcement
of interstate shipping regulations is alarmingly lax. The
fact that a reputable retailer is now saying the same thing
is telling - as is the fact that he is now under attack from
other retailers for saying it," WSWA CEO Craig Wolf told
Drinks International.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, another trade
organization, the Specialty Wine Retailers' Association
(SWRA), has said that Wine.com is really trying to muscle
competitors out of the business. Michael Aaron, chairman of
New York wine retailer Sherry-Lehmann, agrees with that
sentiment.
"It is absolutely terrible what they're doing. They're
trying to bring the wine industry back 50 years to execute a
bad idea that will only cost the consumer much more money,"
Aaron told Wine Spectator. "They have set up a method that
is so impractical and so costly for the consumer. Have you
made a comparison on their prices and what they charge? It's
unbelievable. They're gouging the public."
Regardless of what trade organizations and Wine.com's
competitors say, it's clear that the wine-drinking public is
not happy with Wine.com's decision to act as an industry
watchdog.
Alder Yarrow, who pens the popular Vinography blog, blasted Wine.com
(http://www.vinography.com/archives/2008/01/winecom_gives_retailers_and_co.html),
and many of his readers agreed with his sentiment.
"The wine industry, while competitive, is generally marked
by a real collegiality, and it's despicable to see such
shallow, backstabbing behavior on the part of Wine.com.
Shame on them. It's mean spirited from a competitive
standpoint, and it has the indirect effect of screwing
ordinary consumers," Yarrow wrote.
While commenters on Vinography took Wine.com to task,
Bergsund did not run and hide. Instead, he began posting on
the blog.
"We're just as frustrated with state laws as you are. Try to
resist judging us on this too soon - we know consumers need
the best possible access to the best wine can offer, and
we've already seen a couple states head in the direction of
opening up!" Wine.com's CEO wrote.
Yarrow responded, ending his comment by telling Bergsund, "I
think you will find that this effort is going to do you a
LOT of harm from a PR perspective."
Bergsund, meanwhile, understands that his company is going
to take some publicity hits.
"We are willing to take risks to challenge the status quo,
including negative PR," he wrote on Vinography.
Right or wrong, Wine.com's actions have resulted in negative
attention. I believe, however, that the company understood
this was a distinct possibility when it embarked on its
crusade. While wine aficionados who traffic wine-related
websites may choose no longer to buy from Wine.com, I think
that the vast majority of the company's commerce comes from
less involved customers. In other words, to serve the many,
Wine.com has chosen to alienate the few.
At the moment, the Wine.com story has not reached the
mainstream media, and it may never pique the interests of
anyone outside of the spirits industry. Regardless, the
company needs to be conscious of the possibility that the
story could do further damage to its image. It also must
weigh the risks and rewards of continuing its sting strategy
versus the negative impact it could have on its target
consumers.
Strategic moves such as the one Wine.com has made are geared
towards improving a business, and these maneuvers are often
forward-looking and not meant to bring about immediate
results. In the near-term, these strategies may bring
negative public relations, but if a company can weather the
initial storm and play the strategy out, it will often be
rewarded. The balancing act can be delicate, but if you
prepare properly and are proactive in your response to the
bad PR, the strategy can play itself out to fulfillment.
|
Ben Silverman is currently the Director of Development and a
Contributing Editor for Indie Research
(http://www.indieresearch.com), an independent investment
research service. Previously, Ben was a business news
columnist for The New York Post and the founder/publisher of
DotcomScoop.com. He can be reached via email at
bensilverman@gmail.com.
|
|
|
|

Subscribe and receive targeted press release announcements. Choose from several categories. Sign up today!

Media Searches
Reference Tools
Journalism Sites
Public Relations
PR Bookstore
Organizations/Assns.
Careers
|