|
PR Fuel: Turning The Tables
Answers by Ben Silverman
Questions by Jeremy Pepper
You corner a reporter in a dark bar. He's drunk and his
tongue is loose. What do you ask him about the business of
PR and the media?
___
(Note: I certainly wasn't drunk - just high on the Marlins'
12-inning win over the Yankees. We conducted this interview
with instant messenger.)
JP: Would you ever consider moving to the dark side of PR?
BS: Totally. I think all burnt out reporters should give PR
a "spin". I mean, it's sort of like a criminal becoming a
cop. I know how you guys think and I know how journalists
think. I think being a PR person would be fun, but I'd only
want to do corporate communications or damage control. I
would not want to actually pitch journalists because I know
how difficult it is. But I'd love to try my hand at PR. If I
found a company, or politician or cause that I believed in,
I'd be willing to go to the dark side. That is, if the money
was right. You guys make a lot of money, right? Because
journalism doesn't pay well.
___
JP: Do you honor non-disclosures or embargoes, or am I
wasting my time sending you those things?
BS: Most reporters do honor embargoes and it's not a waste
of time. However, the news has to be embargo-worthy and you
have to play fair. You can't embargo the news to a dozen
media outlets because it cheapens the newsworthiness. Why
should I agree to an embargo if you're giving it to
everyone? Is it really an embargo then? Nah, it's just a
limited-distribution press release. Use the embargo wisely
if it you want it honored.
___
JP: I have worked with a lot of PR people - while at an
agency with colleagues, working with other agencies on
client projects, and when I was in-house - and it amazes me
the huge disparity in competence. I'm sure you've worked
with PR people that you want to scream at because of their
comments or pitches, but have you ever exacted revenge in
either print or by just yelling at them?
BS: No comment. Haha. Um... I'm trying to remember if I've
ever exacted revenge in print. I don't think I have, but I'm
sure I wanted to.
JP: You wanna skip that one?
BS: No, gimme a sec. Ok, I guess I'll say that I do know
journalists who have purposely written stories to exact
revenge on PR people. To the best of my knowledge, I've
never done it. On my old website I would, from time to time,
call out PR people for doing stupid things. And in this
newsletter I write about dumb PR moves and people I consider
to be bad PR practitioners, but I protect their identity to
avoid embarrassment. In truth, I very rarely yell at anyone,
much less someone I'm working with. PR people yell at me
more than I've ever yelled at them.
(Note: I did a terrible job of answering the last question.
A fine example of how NOT to answer a tough question.)
___
JP: How off-the-record can I be with you - is this going to
come back and bite me in the butt?
BS: You can tell me anything you want baby - I swear, I'll
keep it a secret. And yes, it will definitely come back to
bite you in the butt. Off the record is basically your prime
spin zone. Use OTR to set the record straight, but
understand that whatever you say, it will probably end up in
print. A good reporter will ask whether or not the
"information is for publication." Even if you say no, a good
reporter will take the information to another source and get
it verified. If you say something OTR, expect that it could
very well end up in print.
___
JP: I think you're a really cool guy, and like hanging out
with you - you're a buddy. But, can PR people really be
friends with reporters, or do we always need to be on guard
and worry about that on-the-record issue?
BS: Why can't we be friends? Sure, PR people and reporters
can be friends. Didn't the President's press secretary date
a reporter on "The West Wing"? And didn't Michael J. Fox
date a reporter on "Spin City"? Like any relationship, there
will reach a point when you're truly friends and both sides
can drop the professional guard. Some of my best friends are
PR people and one reason is because we have common
professional interests. We help each other a lot of and I'd
rather spend time with my PR friends than my journalist
friends. Once you buddy up to a reporter, there's a lot of
quid pro quo that can happen. You help me with my job, I'll
help you with mine. But if you touch my girlfriend...
___
(Note: Jeremy had a momentary brain freeze here and I was
forced to ask him a question to get his brain jump-started.)
BS: Do you ever think to yourself that ending up in PR is
some sort of punishment for past sins?
JP: I fell into public relations, and love it. I work with a
lot of great people - PR and journalists - and have made
some lifetime friends that I would have never met. Yes, PR
is stressful. Yes, PR means being yelled at by reporters,
clients, co-workers. But, it's also one of those professions
that can help people, can change public perception for the
better. I know a lot of people my age (early 30's) that are
re-thinking their professions - I just love what I do. It's
fun.
BS: Let me just say that the answer you gave me is one
reason I love PR people - you're so predictable!
JP: Off-the-record, I really do like what I do. I would have
left PR if I didn't.
(Note: I began yelling at Jeremy at this point.)
___
JP: Are there a lot of perks with journalism? On the PR
side, you get the schwag from tradeshows, and some client
goodies if they are a consumer goods account. But, with the
guidelines in journalism being so strict, do you get ANY
goodies?
BS: Most media outlets have rules about getting gifts and
such, but I've never personally been told that I can't
accept a gift. Truth be told, there's nothing you could give
me that would sway my opinion of your company or product
anyway. I mean, free stuff is great, but having dignity,
scruples and a job is better. I get a lot of books, CDs,
t-shirts, etc., stuff like that. I give a lot of the
t-shirts to charity and such and I basically dole out the
other stuff to friends if I don't want it. One of the cool
things about covering the tech industry though is that I get
to test out a lot of gadgets, even though I never write
about 'em, just the actually companies. A certain company
sent me a test unit of an awesome tech product about six
months ago and I still have it. I pray they never ask for it
back. At the same time, I've written very negatively about
the company recently - and for good reason - so it's not
like having the product swayed my coverage in any way. I get
a lot of offers for free meals and drinks, but laziness
forces me to turn most of them down. And more often than
not, I go Dutch on the bill to avoid any conflict. All in
all, after being a journalist for three years, I probably
have less than $500 worth of free stuff in my possession,
and I don't even remember who sent me any of it.
___
JP: Has there ever been a time that you didn't write a bad
article about a company, because you liked the PR person or
the company? Have you ever held back in an article, or its
always balls-out? Or do you warn the person prior to
BS: Ooh, good one. Truth be told, I don't remember any
incident where I held back on a negative article because I
liked the PR person or the company. I've definitely been
spun out of writing negative articles. But in those cases,
it was always a matter of weighing the facts and perhaps,
changing my opinion when presented with new facts. There are
plenty of PR-journalist relationships that evolve to the
point where a negative article can be squashed. I guess I
have some of those, but I've never been asked to kill an
article by a PR person. My reputation is such that I'll do
it anyway, so why bother asking? Take your lumps, try to put
the best light on it and move it. I make very clear to PR
people what the tone of my articles will be. If it's
negative, if it's an attack - I let them know. I don't want
to be accused of misleading someone. And there's no harm in
asking a journalist what the tone or purpose of the article
is. You should always ask.
___
JP: Journalism lately has taken many lumps because of the
Jayson Blair incident, Stephen Glass, et al. Have you
noticed that you have had problems with being trusted or
respected in your paper? Have you noticed that it's harder
to get stories?
BS: In the immediate aftermath of the Jayson Blair incident,
I did notice some people were unwilling to talk to me. This
may have been because I write for The New York Post and they
were confusing it with The New York Times, which is
laughable for a number of reasons. I haven't experienced any
problems with my normal sources and I really haven't had a
difficult time cultivating new sources. Where I'm having the
most problems is in interviewing "normal" people. By this I
mean when I interview people for trend pieces and such. I
just did an article on a new technology that is gaining
consumer traction and I interviewed about dozen people using
this technology. Four or five of them expressed concerns
that I'd misquote them or write about the technology wrong.
I don't get those type of concerns from PR people or my
normal sources. I think your average Joe is getting a better
understanding of how to deal with the press.
___
JP: In your opinion, are there media outlets that PR people
shouldn't pitch, or is any positive press (no matter the
outlet) good press?
BS: Every media outlet is worth pitching. Unless it's some
White Supremacist newsletter, you shouldn't ignore anyone.
Pitch high, pitch low, pitch far, pitch wide. You never know
which media outlet has power on a certain day. It all
depends on who is reading or watching. Don't get hung up
with a "target" audience idea because you really don't know
what your target audience is reading or watching on a given
day. If you want to reach teen girls, yes, pitch Seventeen
Magazine. But you should also pitch The Wall St. Journal
because those teens' parents may be reading it. I sometimes
find that the best press comes from the most obscure media
outlets. When I ran my record label, I had an album reviewed
in a big alternative music publication and though the review
was very positive, it didn't impact sales or radio play. A
few months later, some website I'd never heard of ran a
review and the next thing I know, I was getting all kinds of
orders and emails from people saying they'd heard the album
on the radio. Why? Because the website was well-read by
college radio DJs.
___
BS: Okay, last one. I'm tired, cold and hungry.
JP: During the dot-com boom, a lot of the mainstream and
well-respected press seemed to buy the dot-com hype and
drink deeply from the Kool-Aid. A lot of those columnists
and reporters seemed to have walked away unscathed, but the
bankers have been vilified. Why was the press able to walk
away okay from the implosion and not get hurt for overly
hyping vapor?
BS: Well, who vilified the bankers? It was the press. The
press did take heat, from people like me actually. And then
I ended up in the press, so I guess I'm paying them back for
hyping companies like my own $12 million-funded piece of
junk. The press will always be under the microscope, and
rightfully so. We're essentially public servants, like it or
not. The dot-com era probably was a low point in how the
modern press covers the business world. A lot of people in
the press lost their jobs because of the dot-com bust and in
my opinion, that's helped bring better journalism to the
world. You'll also notice that as the market turned south,
CNBC's viewership declined and circulation of business
magazines and such dropped dramatically. That was the
payback. But I think the biggest damage was done to the PR
industry because you guys were the ones telling the story. I
know a lot of my ideas about PR people came from dealing
with the dot-com flacks and seeing my own in action. I saw
how easy it was to sell a piece of garbage and spin it as a
diamond in the rough. I think a lot of the heat the PR world
continues to take is because of what happened in the dot-com
era. Aside from the funny stories, hype and such, the whole
thing was an economic disaster, so in the end, nothing was
very funny about it. The hype was driven by the media, which
was driven by PR, so whose fault is it? All of 'em!
___
Visit the PR Fuel website at http://www.prfuel.com for daily
PR industry news and commentary.
|
Ben Silverman is currently the Director of Development and a
Contributing Editor for Indie Research
(http://www.indieresearch.com), an independent investment
research service. Previously, Ben was a business news
columnist for The New York Post and the founder/publisher of
DotcomScoop.com. He can be reached via email at
bensilverman@gmail.com.
|
|
|
|

Subscribe and receive targeted press release announcements. Choose from several categories. Sign up today!

Media Searches
Reference Tools
Journalism Sites
Public Relations
PR Bookstore
Organizations/Assns.
Careers
|